How we help / question to evidence to action
We combine executive advisory, technical investigation and control engineering around the decision you need to make. We do not assume that another dashboard, framework or model will resolve the problem.
The engagement produces defined deliverables, tested findings and clear ownership. Where facts are incomplete, we state the gap rather than turn an assumption into a conclusion.
Select your challenge
For: General counsel, boards, CISOs, compliance leaders and insurers.
What we do: Reconstruct model and prompt versions, retrieved data, agent/tool permissions, approvals, outputs and downstream effects. Test whether the approved controls existed and operated.
An event chronology, control-failure analysis, affected-scope findings, evidence gaps and a remediation plan.
For: Incident leaders, business owners, counsel, insurers and claims teams.
What we do: Connect attack activity, identity use, recovery actions, preservation instructions and business interruption to source records. Reconcile technical facts with the issues counsel and insurance advisers must assess.
A source-backed incident and recovery timeline, preservation map, loss-evidence index and unresolved technical questions.
For: Compliance, internal audit, risk leaders and technology owners.
What we do: Map the requirement to the responsible owner, deployed control, test and operating record. Investigate mismatches and distinguish missing evidence from a confirmed failure.
An evidence register, tested gaps, ownership and prioritized corrective actions.
For: Counsel, investigation teams, compliance analysts and transaction advisers.
What we do: Reconstruct data meaning and relationships, test joins and selection criteria, reconcile totals and document the limits of historical records. Keep substantive legal criteria with counsel.
A data map, repeatable analysis, traceable population definitions and a clear account of uncertainty.
For: Executives, technology owners, CISOs, privacy and product teams.
What we do: Inventory components and dependencies, set approval boundaries, minimize unnecessary data, test risky actions and build a response path. Remove duplicative low-value approvals without removing necessary oversight.
An operating model, approved-use register, practical control tests, monitoring design and accountable escalation.
For: Investors, corporate development, procurement and deal counsel.
What we do: Examine actual technology evidence, incident history, AI/data dependencies, contractual representations and remediation cost drivers before commitment.
A red-flag register, evidence index, conditional approval criteria and post-close priorities.
Ways to engage
Scope, access, confidentiality, deliverables and acceptance criteria are agreed before substantive work begins.
A defined review of an AI deployment, control gap, incident, supplier or transaction. Receive findings and prioritized decisions.
Implement ownership, workflows, monitoring and tests. Confirm the remedy against agreed evidence rather than closing a ticket on assertion.
Fractional leadership and recurring assurance help control exceptions, new dependencies and technical debt remain visible and owned.
Responsible boundaries
We provide technical risk, forensic, discovery and assurance support. Legal advice, privilege decisions, representation and litigation decisions remain with licensed counsel. No assessment guarantees a court, insurance or regulatory outcome.
Define necessary data before collection, restrict access and keep sensitive content out of general monitoring wherever possible. Preserve required records and legal holds; minimization is not destruction of relevant evidence.
Continue the conversation
Review the technical and advisory disciplines, their concrete deliverables and the outcomes they support.
